05/26/2026
Is 1.6 PO₂ safe? Should you always stay below 1.4? And why do so many experienced divers still use both limits depending on the dive phase?

If you’ve ever felt confused by conflicting advice around oxygen exposure limits, you’re not alone. Recreational nitrox divers, technical divers, and CCR users often hear the same numbers repeated — but not always explained clearly. The good news? The practical rule set is actually pretty simple.
In this article, we’ll break down:
Whether you dive nitrox recreationally or run a CCR with variable setpoints, the goal is the same: manage oxygen exposure intentionally instead of guessing.
PO₂ (partial pressure of oxygen) is the amount of oxygen pressure your body experiences at depth.
Why does it matter?
Because as PO₂ rises, so does the risk of acute CNS oxygen toxicity — the type associated with convulsions underwater. The formula itself is simple:
PO2 = FO2 x Pabs
Where:
That’s comfortably within common recreational nitrox limits.
But increase either:
…and PO₂ climbs quickly.
That’s why nitrox planning is really oxygen exposure planning.
Here’s the simplified rule most divers eventually settle on:
Dive Phase Common PO₂ Limit
Working / active phase 1.4 ATA
Controlled decompression 1.6 ATA
This isn’t random tradition. It’s about risk margin.
During the active phase of a dive, divers may experience:
higher gas density.
And CO₂ is a major factor here.
High CO₂ levels are believed to significantly increase susceptibility to CNS oxygen toxicity. In real-world diving, you usually can’t perfectly predict exertion levels underwater — so divers build in margin.
That margin is commonly:
But it always depends on how long you've been exposed to that partial pressure
SCUBA divers are exposed to maximum PO₂ only at maximum depth, or at maximum depth with each gas mixture. CCR divers are constantly exposed to the same PO₂
Now compare that to a typical decompression stop:
relatively short exposure windows.
That’s a much more controlled environment can be operationally efficient while still remaining within commonly accepted exposure frameworks.
The key point:
1.6 ATA is generally treated as a controlled exposure limit — not a default operating target for all phases of the dive. That distinction matters.
Most modern dive computers track oxygen exposure using NOAA-style limits. You’ll usually see this displayed as:
oxygen exposure
They all refer to the same basic concept: how much of your recommended oxygen exposure you’ve used.
This tracks short-term exposure associated with acute oxygen toxicity risk. Higher PO₂ = faster CNS accumulation.
Example anchors from NOAA-style exposure tables:
PO₂ Approx. Single Exposure Limit
1.4 ATA 150 minutes
1.5 ATA 120 minutes
1.6 ATA 45 minutes
That’s why:
OTU tracks longer-term pulmonary oxygen exposure. For many recreational nitrox dives, OTU is less important.
But it becomes highly relevant during:
multi-day exposure accumulation.
This is why serious dive planning should track:
and OTU together.
Modern dive computers — including advanced technical and CCR systems — typically automate this process in real time.
This is where many simplified internet discussions become misleading.
PO₂ alone does not tell the whole story.
Several factors may increase oxygen toxicity susceptibility:
long exposure durations
That’s why two divers can experience the same PO₂ very differently depending on conditions.
Practical Rule
The more stressful the dive becomes:
In 2025, a NOAA-supported expert workshop revisited one of the biggest questions in modern CCR diving:
Are traditional CNS oxygen exposure limits too conservative for commonly used CCR setpoints around PO₂ 1.3?
The discussion was driven by a simple reality:
modern CCR dives frequently exceed older NOAA oxygen exposure tables — especially during long decompression phases — yet reported CNS oxygen toxicity incidents remain relatively rare.
A recent publication in *Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine Journal
which remains one of the most common default CCR setpoints.
The updated recommendation concluded that dives consisting of:
Why This Matters for CCR Divers
This is highly relevant because:
The revised guidance also reflects something many experienced CCR divers already observed operationally:
modern technical dives often exceeded older NOAA tables without a corresponding rise in CNS toxicity events.
The nuance matters.
The updated recommendation applies specifically to:
or treating oxygen toxicity risk as “solved.”
The same paper also emphasizes that:
and evidence for higher operational PO₂ ranges is still limited.
So for most divers, the practical takeaway remains conservative and simple:
If you want a practical takeaway, here it is.
Use More Conservative PO₂ When:
CO₂ retention risk increases
1.6 ATA Is Most Commonly Used When:
OTU (especially for CCR or repetitive technical diving)
Consistency matters more than internet debates.
The easiest way to remove uncertainty from oxygen planning is simple: Use the Gasblend and Planner calculators. A good workflow should allow you to:
and review your overall oxygen loading before the dive.
This is especially useful for:
and repetitive nitrox exposure.
Recommended Workflow
The goal isn’t to chase maximum limits. The goal is to maintain predictable safety margins while still running efficient dives.
Final Takeaway
The 1.4 vs 1.6 discussion is less about “right vs wrong” and more about matching PO₂ to the operational context.
The simplified version:
That framework has remained popular for a reason: it balances efficiency with practical real-world safety margins. And regardless of what limits your team or training agency uses, the most important habit is this:
Don’t just plan depth. Plan oxygen exposure.
All for Free.
